Skip to the content
BATTERYCROSS Cell cross-reference, drawn to size

Index / Shell 7.9 x 3.6 mm / NR41

NR41

NR41 — silver oxide, 1.4 V, 7.9 x 3.6 mm. Not listed by Energizer. The closest it still lists: PR41 drops straight in, and runs 1.45 V — +3.6%, a shade high, and it is zinc air, which must breathe.

What fits the compartment, and what does not

Fit answers whether it enters the compartment. Voltage answers whether the circuit will notice. A cell that fits is not always a safe substitute.

CellFitVoltageChemistryCapacity
PR41drop-in1.45 V +3.6%close enoughzinc air
SR41drop-in1.55 V +10.7%reads offsilver oxide41 mAh
329sits lower1.55 V +10.7%reads offsilver oxide39 mAh
SR59sits lower1.55 V +10.7%reads offsilver oxide32 mAh
SR58sits lower1.55 V +10.7%reads offsilver oxide27 mAh
341sits lower1.55 V +10.7%reads offsilver oxide13 mAh
346sits lower1.55 V +10.7%reads offsilver oxide9.5 mAh
PR48too tall1.45 V +3.6%close enoughzinc air
SR48too tall1.55 V +10.7%reads offsilver oxide75 mAh

2 cells drop in and they are not equivalent: of those, SR41 sits furthest at +10.7% of this cell’s 1.4 V, high enough that a calibrated instrument reads above true.

Also stamped 1178M, E312E

Nominal1.4V
Diameter7.9mm
Height3.6mm
In the Energizer catalogNot listed

Unlisted, but something drops straight in

NR41 (also 1178M) has left the Energizer catalog, but the swap is easy: PR41 is the same 7.9 x 3.6 mm and runs at 1.45 V against this cell's 1.4 V. 1 other current cell fits the same slot. The same cell is stamped 1178M and E312E depending on who made it.

What the chemistry changes

Everything above answers size and voltage. What it cannot answer is chemistry, and 1 other kind is in play here beside the silver oxide this cell uses.

  • Silver oxide holds its voltage almost flat until it is spent, which is why watches and light meters were built around it.
  • Zinc air takes oxygen from the air through the holes in its face. It starts discharging the moment the tab comes off and runs down in weeks whether the device is used or not, and a sealed compartment starves it.

What a watch movement does with this cell

A quartz movement pulls a short pulse through the cell every second and reads the voltage between pulses. That is why the chemistry in this envelope matters more than the size does. Silver oxide holds 1.4 V nearly flat until it is spent.

LR41 is the same 7.9 x 3.6 mm in alkaline: 1.5 V against this cell's 1.4 V, +7.1%. The case cannot tell them apart; the movement can. Energizer no longer lists NR41, so the cell in the case of an older watch may have no current part under this designation at all. 9 cells measure close enough to compare against it in the Energizer data this site reads, and 9 of them are still listed.

  • The nearest is PR41: it drops straight in and runs 1.45 V, close enough.
  • Energizer files it for North America, which is where the part is sold rather than where the cell will work.
  • Energizer no longer lists NR41 at all, so whatever goes into that compartment next will be a substitution rather than a replacement.

Drawn to scale

7.9 mm3.6 mm14 px per mm

NR41, side elevation, from the published figures

NR41LR41PR41SR4134634114 px per mm

The same scale for all of them. The dashed line marks the height of NR41: a silhouette that stops short of it will not reach the contact, one that crosses it will not let the cover close.

This cellAnother cell, same scale

Every published figure

Capacity is missing here, and with it every figure derived from capacity: 9 figures are published, 5 fields are not.

DesignationNR41
Also stamped1178M, E312E
ChemistrySilver Oxide
Nominal voltage1.4 V
Diameter7.9 mm
Height3.6 mm
Weight0.9 g
In the Energizer catalogNo longer listed
Listed forNorth America

What the datasheet does not say

Beyond size and voltage the sheet for NR41 is thin: 1 published figure below, and no impedance, no cutoff and no operating range at all. That silence is the maker's, not ours.

Where the part is filed
North America. That is a statement about the maker's distribution and not about where the cell works.

Is that a lot of energy?

Capacity is not published for this cell, so it is absent from the energy ranking rather than placed at the bottom of it. What can be compared is size: 7.9 x 3.6 mm, against a shell that holds 4 designations.

A width the catalog keeps returning to

7.9 mm is a width this catalog keeps coming back to: 16 coins sit within half a millimeter of it, NR41 included.

  • LR41 — 7.9 x 3.6 mm, 1.5 V, alkaline.
  • MR41 — 7.9 x 3.7 mm, 1.4 V, mercuric oxide.
  • MR48 — 7.9 x 5.4 mm, 1.4 V, mercuric oxide.
  • 9 of those ones are still listed. 14 of the 82 coins share its 1.4 V exactly.

The maker's own part numbers

NR41 carries 2 names beyond the designation, and every one of them is a manufacturer part number: a catalog line, not a size and not a standard.

  • 1178M — a manufacturer part number for NR41, not a standard designation.
  • E312E — a manufacturer part number for NR41, not a standard designation.

The cell that differs only in depth

The code says the size, so the cells that get confused with NR41 are the ones that keep its diameter and change its depth. 12 cells share this diameter at depths from 1.3 to 5.4 mm, and every one of them enters the same opening.

  • 346 — same diameter, 1.3 mm tall against this cell's 3.6: 2.3 mm shallower, which neither designation carries.
  • 341 — same diameter, 1.4 mm tall against this cell's 3.6: 2.2 mm shallower, which neither designation carries.
  • SR716W — same diameter, 1.6 mm tall against this cell's 3.6: 2 mm shallower, which neither designation carries.
  • LR41 — the same 7.9 x 3.6 mm in alkaline at 1.5 V. Identical on a caliper, different in the circuit.
  • PR41 — the same 7.9 x 3.6 mm in zinc air at 1.45 V. Identical on a caliper, different in the circuit.
  • On a scale the difference shows before it shows on a caliper: this one weighs 0.9 g.

A thin record, and what that costs

The maker's record for NR41 is thin: 5 of 7 fields are blank, and only 2 are filled. What follows from a blank is an absence on this page, never a guess.

The blanks are the same in all 1 record behind this designation, so they are the catalog's silence and not a merge losing a value. What is not missing is the envelope: 7.9 x 3.6 mm, published and checked against the designation itself.

  • No capacity — so this page cannot tell you how long it runs, and every energy figure that depends on it.
  • No volume — so this page cannot tell you energy per cubic centimeter, which is how cells of different shapes are compared here.
  • No cutoff voltage — so this page cannot tell you what the capacity figure was counted down to, without which the capacity is a number without a scale.
  • No impedance — so this page cannot tell you whether the cell can drive a pulse, which is the whole question in a watch or a sensor.

Before you swap anything

Everything here is computed from published dimensions and nominal voltages. That answers whether a cell enters the compartment and whether the voltage matches on paper. It does not answer what your device does with the difference, and it cannot: a cell that fits can still be the wrong cell.

One more limit, and it is the biggest. This site reads a single manufacturer’s catalog. When a page says a designation is not listed, that means Energizer no longer offers a part under it — not that nobody makes the cell. Other makers may still sell it, and for common sizes they usually do.

A voltage difference is one relation between two cells, and this page prints it from the cell it is about — in every table on the page, including the one listing cells no longer made. A figure always belongs to the cell whose voltage is printed beside it: a cell that runs lower than this one carries a minus here, one that runs higher carries a plus, and two cells at the same nominal voltage carry zero. Meet the same pair on the other cell’s page and the sign is the other one, with the figure taken against that cell instead of this one; where the two run at the same voltage, both pages print zero. The class beside the figure is not read off that figure directly. It is decided on the gap itself, taken against the higher of the two nominal voltages, so one pair of cells gets one class whichever page you meet it on: counted from this side the boundary of the class that still runs falls at 20.0% below and 25.0% above, which is the same gap divided once by the larger nominal and once by the smaller. What genuinely differs between the two directions is the consequence, and the words carry it: a cell that runs low makes a calibrated instrument read below true, and a cell that runs high makes it read above.

3 things this site cannot see. Whether the contacts reach a shorter cell. Whether the device was calibrated for a chemistry that holds its voltage flat, which silver oxide does and alkaline does not. Whether the equipment tolerates the higher current a different chemistry can deliver. Rechargeable cells are never a drop-in for primary cells regardless of size.

Cells measured next to this one

The shell is shared across chemistries: 3 cells sit at exactly this size in alkaline, silver oxide and zinc air. Same hole, different insides, different discharge curve.

  • LR41 — 7.9 x 3.6 mm, 1.5 V
  • PR41 — 7.9 x 3.6 mm, 1.45 V
  • SR41 — 7.9 x 3.6 mm, 1.55 V
  • 346 — 7.9 x 1.3 mm, 1.55 V
  • 341 — 7.9 x 1.4 mm, 1.55 V
  • SR716W — 7.9 x 1.6 mm, 1.55 V
  • SR58 — 7.9 x 2.1 mm, 1.55 V

Where these numbers come from

Dimensions, voltages, chemistries and capacities are published by the manufacturer and reproduced without change. Everything else on the page is ours, computed from those figures: whether one cell fits where another sat, how far apart their voltages are, stored energy and energy per cubic centimeter, the rank within a shell, and the check of the designation against the measured size.

Fit is decided within 0.3 mm on every axis, which is the order of a contact spring's travel. Voltage classes are decided by consequence, not by roundness, and they are decided on the gap between two nominal voltages taken against the higher of the two: 2.0% or less of it is the same working voltage, 6.0% starts to matter to a calibrated instrument, and past 20.0% it is a different class altogether. Measuring the gap against the higher figure is what makes the verdict the same from either cell’s page, while the printed percentage stays counted from the cell you are reading about. Cells with identical stored energy share a rank instead of being ordered arbitrarily.

Ranking uses capacity times nominal voltage, because capacity alone is not comparable across chemistries: 150 mAh at 3 V is twice the energy of 150 mAh at 1.5 V. Neighbors are chosen by measurement and never alphabetically, because two cells filed next to each other by name usually have nothing in common. A blank in any table means the maker publishes no figure, which is not the same as zero.

Source: Energizer technical data, retrieved 1 September 2026.

The record behind this page

Every figure on this page comes from one catalog record, number 770, and it is named below. No technical data sheet is filed against it, which is why several fields on this page are blank.

  1. [1] Energizer catalog record 770, listed as E312E, obsolete in the snapshot. No technical data sheet is filed against this record.

Every figure above is reproduced from those records without change; the comparisons are ours and are described on the method page. Snapshot: Energizer technical data, retrieved 1 September 2026.

Putting this on a forum or a repair page? The same answer without the site around it — fit, voltage, chemistry and the limits that go with them — is at /embed/nr41/. It loads nothing from anywhere else. Paste this:

<iframe src="https://batterycross.com/embed/nr41/" width="100%" height="520" loading="lazy" title="NR41 replacements"></iframe>