Skip to the content
BATTERYCROSS Cell cross-reference, drawn to size

Index / 7LR44

7LR44

7LR44 — alkaline, 10.5 V, 13 x 47.2 mm. Not listed by Energizer, and nothing it still lists is the right voltage class for this compartment: 4LR44 goes in and stands shorter, and runs 6 V — -42.9%, a lower voltage class. Not a substitute.

What fits the compartment, and what does not

Fit answers whether it enters the compartment. Voltage answers whether the circuit will notice. A cell that fits is not always a safe substitute.

CellFitVoltageChemistryCapacity
4LR44sits lower6 V -42.9%wrong classalkaline152 mAh

Nothing Energizer still lists is the same depth. The one option below shares the diameter and stands 25.2 mm against this cell's 47.2, and every one of them is shallower, so each stands off the contact by the difference — a spring may take that up and a flat tab will not.

Also stamped 1601A, EN177A

Nominal10.5V
Diameter13mm
Height47.2mm
Capacity110mAh
In the Energizer catalogNot listed

Unlisted, and nothing that fits is the right class

Energizer no longer lists 7LR44 (also 1601A), and nothing listed that fits the compartment is the right voltage: 4LR44 goes in and stands shorter, but it runs 6 V against this cell's 10.5 V — 42.9% away, a lower voltage class altogether. A device built for this cell is not built for that one, and the compartment accepting it says nothing about the circuit surviving it.

Several cells in one can, and what that costs

This is not one cell. It is a stack sealed in one can, which is why the voltage is a multiple and the diameter is not. 7LR44 at 10.5 V is 7 cells of 1.5 V in series.

A series stack is only as good as its worst cell. One weak element takes the whole can down, and nothing on the outside shows which one it was. Published capacity 110 mAh for the whole stack, not per cell: capacity does not add in series, voltage does. 1 cell measures close enough to compare against it in the Energizer data this site reads, and 1 of it is still listed.

  • The nearest is 4LR44: it enters and sits lower and runs 6 V, wrong class.
  • Energizer files it for North America, which is where the part is sold rather than where the cell will work.
  • Energizer no longer lists 7LR44 at all, so whatever goes into that compartment next will be a substitution rather than a replacement.

Drawn to scale

13 mm47.2 mm4.4 px per mm

7LR44, side elevation, from the published figures

7LR444RN432CR111084LR444SR445LR444.4 px per mm

The same scale for all of them. The dashed line marks the height of 7LR44: a silhouette that stops short of it will not reach the contact, one that crosses it will not let the cover close.

This cellAnother cell, same scale

Every published figure

11 figures are published, and one is not: impedance. The row is absent rather than estimated. It reached shelves as EN177A.

Designation7LR44
Also stamped1601A, EN177A
ChemistryAlkaline
Nominal voltage10.5 V
Diameter13 mm
Height47.2 mm
Weight14 g
Volume6.2 cc
Capacity110 mAh
Stored energy1155 mWh
Energy density186 mWh per cc
In the Energizer catalogNo longer listed
Listed forNorth America

2 rows in the table are not the maker's but ours: stored energy and energy per cubic centimeter. Everything else is reproduced without change.

What the datasheet does not say

Beyond size and voltage the sheet for 7LR44 is thin: 2 published figures below, and no impedance, no cutoff and no operating range at all. That silence is the maker's, not ours.

The part occupies 6.2 cubic centimeters and weighs 14 g. Capacity and voltage together put 1155 milliwatt-hours in that space. Energizer files it for North America.

Mass against volume
14 g filling 6.2 cubic centimeters. When the printing has worn off, a kitchen scale separates two cells of one envelope faster than a caliper does.
Where the part is filed
North America. That is a statement about the maker's distribution and not about where the cell works.

Is that a lot of energy?

Nothing else measured shares this shell, so the comparison has to go site-wide: 1155 milliwatt-hours in 6.2 cubic centimeters is 186 mWh per cc, denser than 17% of every cell measured here. Density is ours: the maker publishes capacity and volume and never divides one by the other.

Less energy per cubic centimeter than most

7LR44 carries less in its volume than most: 186 milliwatt-hours per cubic centimeter, below 83 percent of everything here that publishes both figures.

1 of those one is still listed. Its 186 milliwatt-hours per cubic centimeter sit above 17 percent of everything here that publishes both a capacity and a volume. 0 of the 69 cylinders share its 10.5 V exactly.

  • CR15H270 — the next step down by volume: 5.2 cubic centimeters against this cell's 6.2.
  • CR17345 — the next step up: 7 cubic centimeters, 113% of this one.
  • 2CR11108 — 12.8 x 25.2 mm, 6 V, lithium.
  • 4LR44 — 13 x 25.2 mm, 6 V, alkaline.

The maker's own part numbers

7LR44 carries 2 names beyond the designation, and every one of them is a manufacturer part number: a catalog line, not a size and not a standard.

  • 1601A — a manufacturer part number for 7LR44, not a standard designation.
  • EN177A — a manufacturer part number for 7LR44, not a standard designation.

The cell that differs only in depth

The code says the size, so the cells that get confused with 7LR44 are the ones that keep its diameter and change its depth. 5 cells share this diameter at depths from 20.5 to 27.7 mm, and every one of them enters the same opening.

It stands 1 of 1 in this envelope by stored energy. On a scale the difference shows before it shows on a caliper: this one weighs 14 g.

  • 4RN43 — same diameter, 20.5 mm tall against this cell's 47.2: 26.7 mm shallower, which neither designation carries.
  • 2CR11108 — same diameter, 25.2 mm tall against this cell's 47.2: 22 mm shallower, which neither designation carries.
  • 4LR44 — same diameter, 25.2 mm tall against this cell's 47.2: 22 mm shallower, which neither designation carries.
  • 3-315 — 14 mm across at 1.5 V against 13 mm here, 1 mm apart: too wide to enter in this holder.
  • 3-315WC — 14 mm across at 1.5 V against 13 mm here, 1 mm apart: too wide to enter in this holder.

What this page cannot tell you

3 of the 7 fields this site reads are empty for 7LR44: cutoff voltage, impedance and operating temperature. Everything computed from them is absent from this page rather than estimated.

The blanks are the same in all 1 record behind this designation, so they are the catalog's silence and not a merge losing a value. What is not missing is the envelope: 13 x 47.2 mm, published and checked against the designation itself.

  • No cutoff voltage — so this page cannot tell you what the capacity figure was counted down to, without which the capacity is a number without a scale.
  • No impedance — so this page cannot tell you whether the cell can drive a pulse, which is the whole question in a watch or a sensor.
  • No operating temperature — so this page cannot tell you whether the maker claims anything at all below freezing.

Before you swap anything

Everything here is computed from published dimensions and nominal voltages. That answers whether a cell enters the compartment and whether the voltage matches on paper. It does not answer what your device does with the difference, and it cannot: a cell that fits can still be the wrong cell.

One more limit, and it is the biggest. This site reads a single manufacturer’s catalog. When a page says a designation is not listed, that means Energizer no longer offers a part under it — not that nobody makes the cell. Other makers may still sell it, and for common sizes they usually do.

A voltage difference is one relation between two cells, and this page prints it from the cell it is about — in every table on the page, including the one listing cells no longer made. A figure always belongs to the cell whose voltage is printed beside it: a cell that runs lower than this one carries a minus here, one that runs higher carries a plus, and two cells at the same nominal voltage carry zero. Meet the same pair on the other cell’s page and the sign is the other one, with the figure taken against that cell instead of this one; where the two run at the same voltage, both pages print zero. The class beside the figure is not read off that figure directly. It is decided on the gap itself, taken against the higher of the two nominal voltages, so one pair of cells gets one class whichever page you meet it on: counted from this side the boundary of the class that still runs falls at 20.0% below and 25.0% above, which is the same gap divided once by the larger nominal and once by the smaller. What genuinely differs between the two directions is the consequence, and the words carry it: a cell that runs low makes a calibrated instrument read below true, and a cell that runs high makes it read above.

3 things this site cannot see. Whether the contacts reach a shorter cell. Whether the device was calibrated for a chemistry that holds its voltage flat, which silver oxide does and alkaline does not. Whether the equipment tolerates the higher current a different chemistry can deliver. Rechargeable cells are never a drop-in for primary cells regardless of size.

Cells measured next to this one

Nothing in this data is this exact size, but the diameter is a well populated one: 5 cells run from 20.5 to 27.7 mm deep, and this cell is one point on that scale.

  • 4RN43 — 12.7 x 20.5 mm, 6 V
  • 2CR11108 — 12.8 x 25.2 mm, 6 V
  • 4LR44 — 13 x 25.2 mm, 6 V
  • 4SR44 — 13 x 25.2 mm, 6.2 V

Where these numbers come from

Dimensions, voltages, chemistries and capacities are published by the manufacturer and reproduced without change. Everything else on the page is ours, computed from those figures: whether one cell fits where another sat, how far apart their voltages are, stored energy and energy per cubic centimeter, the rank within a shell, and the check of the designation against the measured size.

Fit is decided within 0.3 mm on every axis, which is the order of a contact spring's travel. Voltage classes are decided by consequence, not by roundness, and they are decided on the gap between two nominal voltages taken against the higher of the two: 2.0% or less of it is the same working voltage, 6.0% starts to matter to a calibrated instrument, and past 20.0% it is a different class altogether. Measuring the gap against the higher figure is what makes the verdict the same from either cell’s page, while the printed percentage stays counted from the cell you are reading about. Cells with identical stored energy share a rank instead of being ordered arbitrarily.

Ranking uses capacity times nominal voltage, because capacity alone is not comparable across chemistries: 150 mAh at 3 V is twice the energy of 150 mAh at 1.5 V. Neighbors are chosen by measurement and never alphabetically, because two cells filed next to each other by name usually have nothing in common. A blank in any table means the maker publishes no figure, which is not the same as zero.

Source: Energizer technical data, retrieved 1 September 2026.

The record behind this page

Every figure on this page comes from one catalog record, number 821, and it is linked below. The sheet is the document the dimensions, voltage and capacity were read out of.

  1. [1] Energizer catalog record 821, listed as EN177A, obsolete in the snapshot. Technical data sheet: en177a.pdf.

Every figure above is reproduced from those records without change; the comparisons are ours and are described on the method page. Snapshot: Energizer technical data, retrieved 1 September 2026.

Putting this on a forum or a repair page? The same answer without the site around it — fit, voltage, chemistry and the limits that go with them — is at /embed/7lr44/. It loads nothing from anywhere else. Paste this:

<iframe src="https://batterycross.com/embed/7lr44/" width="100%" height="520" loading="lazy" title="7LR44 replacements"></iframe>